Bruning v. Guthrie City of et al
Mark Bruning |
Guthrie City of, Sereniah Breland, Jim Ahlgren, Damon Devereaux, Gary Haddock, Jonathan Williams, Kyle White, Jill Ochs Tontz and Ann Griffin |
5:2015cv00003 |
January 2, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
Logan |
Joe Heaton |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 84 ORDER the partial motion to dismiss 73 filed by the City of Guthrie and defendants Breland, Ahlgren and Devereaux is granted; motions to dismiss 72 , 75 and 76 filed by defendants Haddock and Williams, defendant Griffin and defendants Tontz an d White are granted in part and denying in part; plaintiff's second and third causes of action are dismissed as to all defendants; plaintiff's intentional interference with employment or business relationship claim in his eighth cause of action is dismissed as to defendants Haddock and Williams; see order for list of remaining claims and other specifics. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 01/20/2016. (lam) |
Filing 58 ORDER the partial motion to dismiss 16 filed by the City of Guthrie is granted in part and denied in part...it is denied as to the 1st and 5th causes of action; the partial motion to dismiss 17 filed by defendants Breland, Ahlgren and Devereaux i s granted; the motions to dismiss filed by defendants Haddock and Williams 18 , Griffin 29 , Tontz 31 and White 30 are granted; plaintiff's 2nd, 3rd, 7th and 8th causes of action are dismissed as to all defendants; the 6th cause of action is dismissed as to defendants Haddock and Williams; plaintiff has filed a motion to amend his complaint 55 which the court grants as to all the claims that are dismissed except for the 3rd and 8th causes of action; leave to amend those claims is denied as amendment would be futile; if plaintiff decides to amend any of the dismissed claims, the amended complaint must be filed by 09/01/2015. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 08/18/2015. (lam) |
Filing 38 ORDER denying 21 plaintiff's motion to remand in accordance with the order previously entered 37 ...plaintiff's response to the pending motions to dismiss shall be filed within 10 days from the date of this order. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 04/21/2015. (lam) (Main Document 38 replaced on 4/21/2015). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.