Baxley v. Oklahoma City City of
Plaintiff: Wesley Baxley
Defendant: Oklahoma City City of
Case Number: 5:2015cv00169
Filed: February 17, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Pottawatomie
Presiding Judge: Robin J. Cauthron
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting 10 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand; copy mailed to Okla. Co. Court. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 4/20/15. (lg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baxley v. Oklahoma City City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wesley Baxley
Represented By: Scott F Brockman
Represented By: Stanley M Ward
Represented By: Bryan B Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oklahoma City City of
Represented By: Richard C Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?