Hymel v. Harvanek et al
Petitioner: Rex L Hymel
Respondent: Kameron Harvanek
Case Number: 5:2015cv00197
Filed: February 26, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Okfuskee
Presiding Judge: Stephen P. Friot
Presiding Judge: Gary M. Purcell
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER ADOPTING 16 Report and Recommendation, DISMISSING Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus as time-barred, DENYING request for an evidentiary hearing, DENYING a certificate of appealability. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 7/9/15. (llg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hymel v. Harvanek et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rex L Hymel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kameron Harvanek
Represented By: Joshua L Lockett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?