Holt v. Roy Blackwell Enterprises Inc
Plaintiff: Katherine Holt
Defendant: Roy Blackwell Enterprises Inc
Case Number: 5:2015cv00326
Filed: March 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Marshall
Presiding Judge: Timothy D. DeGiusti
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion to Strike Certain Affirmative Defenses. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 1/26/2016. (mb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holt v. Roy Blackwell Enterprises Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katherine Holt
Represented By: Mark E Hammons
Represented By: Amber L Hurst
Represented By: Leah M Roper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roy Blackwell Enterprises Inc
Represented By: C Scott Jones
Represented By: Malinda S Matlock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?