Poff v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services et al
| Kimberly Poff |
| Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Ed Lake and Tony Bryan |
| 5:2015cv00936 |
| August 31, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Oklahoma |
| David L. Russell |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER granting 82 Motion for Summary Judgment by DHS, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 11/20/17. (jw)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER denying 57 Motion to Dismiss. The motion to dismissed filed by Dft DHA is denied with regard to plaintiff's Title CII and OADA claim. Any claim for the violation of Plaintiff's due process rights under the Oklahoma constitution is hereby DISMISSED with Prejudice. Plaintiff's claims under Article 12 19 and 22 are hereby REMANDED, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 6/7/17. (jw)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Lake and Bryan, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 8/22/16. (jw)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER; Plaintiff is hereby granted leave to amend her allegationsone final time. Plaintiff shall filed her amended pleading not later than December 31, 2015, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 12/21/15. (jw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
