James v. Mills
1:2010cv00202 |
February 22, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Medford Office |
Mark D. Clarke |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 56 ; Denying as Moot Motion for Appointment of Counsel 66 . The Petition (#2) is DENIED. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No certificate of appealability shall issue as petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutionalright. See 28 U. S.C. § 2253 (c) (2). Signed on 4/15/2015 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (jkm) |
Filing 22 OPINION AND ORDER: Denying Motion to Dismiss 17 ; Adopting Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation 20 . This case is stayed and a status check is set for 12/27/2011. Signed on 12/27/2010 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj) Modified on 12/27/2010 to add opinion verbiage (dkj). |
Filing 20 Findings & Recommendation: Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice 17 should be denied. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 12/17/2010. If objections are filed, responses to the objections are due 14 days after the objections have been filed. Ordered and Signed on 11/24/2010 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: James v. Mills | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.