Chancey v. Washington Mutual Asset-Backed Certificates WMABS Series 2007-HE2 Trust Issuing Entity et al
| 1:2010cv03007 |
| January 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Medford Office |
| Mark D. Clarke |
| Economic Stabilization Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER: Granting Defendants' Motion for FRCP54(b) Judgment 31 ; Denying Plaintiff's Motion for summary judgment 34 . Ordered & Signed on 12/2/10 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (kf)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER: Adopting Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke's Report and Recommendation 22 . Plaintiff's TARP claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's claim against Chase and Washington Mutual are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff is granted 30 days to amend the complaint to name the FDIC as a party. Should the clerk receive undeliverable mail as a result of a failure to notify the clerk of any change in mailing address, the court may, after 60 days, dismiss the complaint, strike the pleadings, or enter a default. See Local Rule 83-12. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 8/23/2010 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chancey v. Washington Mutual Asset-Backed Certificates WMABS Series 2007-HE2 Trust Issuing Entity et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
