Navagium Vectorium, LLC, et al v. Sutton, et al
| Navagium Vectorium, LLC, Outfitter Aviation, LLC and Outfitter Rotary, LLC |
| Outfitter Aviation Oregon, LLC and Roger Sutton |
| 1:2013cv00162 |
| January 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Medford (1) Office |
| Mark D. Clarke |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
ORDER. Please access entire text by document number hyperlink. Ordered and Signed on 02/03/2016 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER on Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law from Bench Trial. The Court orders the parties to work together to submit a proposed judgment by November 11, 2015. Ordered and Signed on 10/14/2015 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER: Denying Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 84 ). Please access entire text by document number hyperlink. Ordered and Signed on 05/19/2015 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER: If Plaintiffs post a $34,000 bond, the court grants Plaintiffs' motion 50 . If the bond is not posted, the court denies Plaintiffs' motion and orders the parties to cooperate to maintain and, if possible, insure the aircraft during the pendency of this case. Defendants shall allow Plaintiffs' mechanics to inspect and maintain the Bonanza as needed. Ordered and Signed on 07/03/2014 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
