Erwin v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Oregon District Court Erwin v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Erwin v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Sharon Erwin
Defendant:	Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number:	1:2014cv02013
Filed:	December 17, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Medford (1) Office
Presiding Judge:	Robert E. Jones
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 24, 2016	Filing 27 ORDER: Granting Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 25 . Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in theamount of $7,189.78 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justic e Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The patties agree that attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiff's attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed inAstrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010).If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiff's attorney and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office as follows: Richard McGinty, P.O. Box 1 2806, Salem, OR 97309-0806. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiffs attorney's office at the address statedabove. Signed on 5/24/2016 by Judge Robert E. Jones. (jkm)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 24, 2016

Filing 27 ORDER: Granting Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 25 . Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in theamount of $7,189.78 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justic e Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The patties agree that attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiff's attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed inAstrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010).If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiff's attorney and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office as follows: Richard McGinty, P.O. Box 1 2806, Salem, OR 97309-0806. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiffs attorney's office at the address statedabove. Signed on 5/24/2016 by Judge Robert E. Jones. (jkm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Erwin v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By:	Ronald K. Silver
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharon Erwin
Represented By:	Richard F. McGinty
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?