Bartlett et al v. Crook County, Oregon et al
| Bradley Bartlett and Bartlett Excavation LLC |
| Crook County, Oregon, Penny Keller, William Zelenka and Scott Cooper |
| 2:2007cv00716 |
| May 15, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Pendleton Office |
| Crook |
| Patricia Sullivan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Based upon the Stipulated Motion for Order and Judgment of Dismissal 134 filed by the parties on August 13, 2010,IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' Stipulated Motion for Order and Judgment of Dismissal 134 is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs or attorney fees to any party. Signed on 8/16/2010 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing
90
OPINION & ORDER: The court adopts the magistrate judgesFindings and Recommendation (# 78 ) and grants defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (# 47 ) as to all plaintiffs claim except the common law claims for Intentional Interfer ence with Contract and Intentional Interference with Economic Advantage. The court rejects the magistrate judges Findings and Recommendation as to those claims and remands them to Magistrate Judge Sullivan for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion and Order. Signed on April 28, 2009 by Judge James A. Redden. (eo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
