Stout et al v. United States Forest Service
| Loren Stout and Piper Stout |
| United States Forest Service |
| 2:2009cv00152 |
| February 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Environmental Matters Office |
| Grant |
| Patricia Sullivan |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| National Forest Management Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
Opinion and Order -Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment 69 is DENIED and defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment 75 is GRANTED as to Claims IV and V and DENIED as to Claim III. Signed on 4/24/2012 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (See formal Opinion and Order, 15pages) (ecp)
|
|
Filing
66
Opinion and Order. Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 33 is GRANTED as to plaintiffs' Claim I, and DENIED AS MOOT as to plaintiffs' Claim II. The 2007 Wild Horse Plan is remanded to the Forest Service. The Forest Service shall initiate c onsultation on its horse management plan while the 2007 Wild Horse Plan remains in effect. The remand period shall be one year. ORDER Defendants' Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 55 is DENIED as to plaintiffs' Claim I, and DENIED AS MOOT as to Plaintiffs' Claim II. Signed on 3/10/2011 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (sp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
