Collicott v. William's et al
| Phillip Curtis Collicott |
| Administration, Business Office, Mr. Geer, Mail Room at SRCI, Mr. Nooth, Snake River Correction's and Max William's |
| 2:2012cv01504 |
| August 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Pendleton (2) Office |
| Anna J. Brown |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
Opinion and Order. The Court concludes Plaintiffs appeal of the Courts January 31, 2014, Opinion and Order granting Defendants Unenumerated Motion to Dismiss is frivolous, and, therefore, Plaintiffs in forma pauperis status should not continue for Plaintiffs appeal. Signed on 03/17/2015 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb) Modified on 3/17/2015 (bb).
|
|
Filing
62
Opinion and Order: The Court GRANTS Defendants Unenumerated Rule 12(b) Motion [39-1] to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust as to Plaintiffs claim related to the Inmate Welfare Fund and DISMISSES that claim without prejudice. The Court also DENI ES Defendants Motion [39-2] for Summary Judgment. This matter will proceed only as to Plaintiffs First Amendment claim related to denial of Prison Profiteers. The Court DIRECTS defense counsel to file a proposed case management plan as to this claim no later than 02/14/2014. The Court will set a R16 Conference thereafter. Signed on 01/31/2014 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 20 page Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
