Gordon v. Franke

Respondent: Steven Franke
Petitioner: Dennis Leroy Gordon
Case Number: 2:2013cv00052
Filed: January 11, 2013
Court: Oregon District Court
Office: Pendleton (2) Office
Presiding Judge: Dennis J. Hubel
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 2, 2015 52 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Hubel's F&R 46 . Accordingly, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 3 is DENIED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED because the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 2-page order attached. Signed on 3/2/2015 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gordon v. Franke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Steven Franke
Represented By: Lynn David Larsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dennis Leroy Gordon
Represented By: Steven T. Wax
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.