Walton v. Arrendondo, MD
Plaintiff: Tyrone Earl Walton
Defendant: Nicolas F. Arrendondo, MD
Case Number: 2:2014cv00626
Filed: April 15, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Pendleton (2) Office
Presiding Judge: Garr M. King
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 79 JUDGMENT - Signed on 1/20/2016 by Judge Garr M. King. (pg)
April 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 49 OPINION AND ORDER: The portion of Dr. Arrendondo's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is voluntarily withdrawn, and I deny Dr. Arrendondo's Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue 22 . Signed on 4/6/2015 by Judge Garr M. King. (pg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walton v. Arrendondo, MD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nicolas F. Arrendondo, MD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyrone Earl Walton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?