C.O. et al v. Portland Public Schools et al
3:2005cv00558 |
April 22, 2005 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland Office |
Dennis J. Hubel |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 217 OPINION AND ORDER - Plaintiff Pat Oman is awarded the sum of $1.00 as nominal damages, payable by Constance Bull and PPS. Signed on 3/31/10 by Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubel. (see formal 35 page opinion and order)Associated Cases: 3:05-cv-00558-HU, 3:05-cv-01715-HU (kb) |
Filing 200 OPINION AND ORDER re jurisdictional issues and Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 161 - (see 12-page opinion/order). Signed on 2/12/10 by Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubel.Associated Cases: 3:05-cv-00558-HU, 3:05-cv-01715-HU (kb) |
Filing 174 OPINION AND ORDER: Ms. Omans motion for reconsideration (doc. # 161) is GRANTED, but the court adheres to its original rulings. Ms. Omans motion for sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (doc. # 162) is DENIED. Signed on 12/18/09 by Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubel. (see formal 8-page opinion)Associated Cases: 3:05-cv-00558-HU, 3:05-cv-01715-HU (kb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: C.O. et al v. Portland Public Schools et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.