Norland v. Oregon Pretrial Services et al
Case Number: 3:2005cv06312
Filed: October 13, 2005
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
Presiding Judge: Janice M. Stewart
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 123 OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Stewart's recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R 119 as my own opinion. The case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed on 1/15/2010 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
December 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 119 Findings & Recommendation: Based on plaintiff's failure to timely file a Pretrial Order or to indicate that he intends to do so, this case should be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 1/12/2010. Signed on 12/22/2009 by Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart. (stewart1, )
September 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 116 OPINION AND ORDER: Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion for Summary Judgment 83 ; Adopting Findings and Recommendation 107 . Signed on 9/29/09 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (mkk)
June 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 107 Order, Findings & Recommendation: Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions (part of docket #93) and Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Response and Request for Sanctions (docket #99) are DENIED; Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgme nt (docket #83) should be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. All claims in this action should be dismissed against each defendant with prejudice, with the exception of Count 3 alleging a Section 1983 violation based on a strip search against Lane County Adult Corrections. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 7/14/2009. Signed on 6/25/2009 by Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart. (stewart1, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Norland v. Oregon Pretrial Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?