Barrer v. Chase Bank USA, N.A. et al
| 3:2006cv00415 |
| March 24, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Dennis J. Hubel |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
185
Opinion And Order. Chase's Motion for Summary Judgment 138 is GRANTED and plaintiffs' Motion to Certify the Class 127 is DENIED. Signed on 2/21/13 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (cib)
|
|
Filing
98
Opinion And Order. Defendants' Motion 85 for Reconsideration or, In The Alternative is denied. Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Entry of a Protective Order 96 is granted as follows: the proposed Protective Order is adopted as an Order of this court. Signed on 5/18/11 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (cib)
|
|
Filing
84
Opinion and Order. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint 71 is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs' claim for "Breach of Contract" is dismissed, pursuant to plaintiffs' related concessions. The motion to dismiss is denied in all other respects. Defendants' Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint 73 is granted. Signed on 1/4/11 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (jlr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barrer v. Chase Bank USA, N.A. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
