Eaton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
| 3:2006cv01474 |
| October 18, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Donald C. Ashmanskas |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER - Attorney fees in the amount of $19,519.00 are hereby awarded to plaintiff's attorney pursuant to 42 USC sec 406(b). The court finds this is a reasonable fee. Previously, this court awarded $7,499.99, pursuant to EAJA, 28 USC sec 2412. When issuing the sec 406(b) check, the agency is directed to subtract the amount previously awarded under the EAJA, and to send to plaintiff's attorney at his current address as shown on this document the balance of $12,019.01, minus any user fee. Any amount withheld (including the EAJA fee offset) after all administrative and court attorneys fees are paid should be released to the claimant Signed on 2/13/09 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
|
Filing
21
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Ashmanskas's recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R as my own opinion 17 . Signed on 2/6/08 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Eaton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
