Precision Automation, Inc. v. Technical Services, Inc. et al
| Precision Automation, Inc. |
| Technical Services, Inc. and David Krevanko |
| 3:2007cv00707 |
| May 14, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Outside State |
| Donald C. Ashmanskas |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
290
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (#284). Accordingly, the Court awards Krevanko attorneys' fees and costs in the sum of $129,432.15. Signed on 3/16/10 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (cib)
|
|
Filing
284
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION - The court should award $129,432.15 in attorney fees and costs to Krevanko in satisfaction Krevanko's application for attorney fees 258 and defendants' bill of costs 174 . Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 3/2/2010. If objections are filed a party may file a response to those objections within 14 days of being served a copy of the objections. Signed on 2/16/10 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
|
Filing
250
OPINION AND ORDER: Adopting Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 214 and, accordingly, GRANTS Defendant Krevanko Motion For Attorneys' Fees and Expenses 171 in the amount to be determined in further proceedings before the Magistrate Judge. Signed on 4/24/09 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (cib)
|
|
Filing
216
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Finding and Recommendation(#189) and construes the disputed claims of the '789 Patent and the '738 Patent as recommended. Signed on 2/2/09 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (cib)
|
|
Filing
214
Findings & Recommendation - Krevanko has met ORS 647.467's "prevailing party" standard for award of attorney fees, and he is entitled to reasonable attorney fees incurred to defend Plaintiffs' trade secret claims. In addition, Kre vanko has met the burden under FRCP 37(c)(2) for an award of attorney fees, and he is entitled to reasonable fees incurred to prove the fact Plaintiffs denied. Accordingly, Krevanko's motion for attorney fees 171 should be granted. This ruling is a determination of liability for attorney fees, made separately from the determination of the amount of fees to be awarded, in accordance with LR 54.3(c)(1). Krevanko shall submit documentation to support his claim for attorney fees. Objections to this Findings and Recommendation are due by 2/5/09. If objections are filed, a party may file a response to those objections within 14 days of the filing date of the objections. Signed on 1/22/09 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
