CollegeNET, Inc. v. The College Network, Inc.
Plaintiff: CollegeNET, Inc.
Defendant: The College Network, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2008cv00601
Filed: May 16, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
County: Multnomah
Presiding Judge: Garr M. King
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 68 OPINION AND ORDER: Denying The College Network, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue of this action to the Southern District of Indiana 20 . Signed on 9/22/09 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (ljl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CollegeNET, Inc. v. The College Network, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CollegeNET, Inc.
Represented By: Michael N. Zachary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The College Network, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?