Chao v. Westside Drywall, Inc. et al
| Elaine L Chao |
| Westside Drywall, Inc., Mohsen Salem and Shirine Salem |
| 3:2008cv06302 |
| October 1, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Marion |
| John V. Acosta |
| Defendant |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER - (This opinion and order is amended for the sole purpose of replacing the word "before" with the word "after" on page 25.)(Opinion and Order 112 filed 4/28/10). Signed on 5/13/10 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER - Based on the unopposed motion 102 to dismiss certain claims and a defendant filed by plaintiff on 3/15/10, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendant Shirine Salem; (2) Claims for back wages earned before 12/1/04; and (3) Claims for back wages for the following individuals: (a) Luis Ernesto Sepulveda; (b) Efren Martinez Carmen; (c) Florencio Diaz Bernabe; (d) Miguel Mendoza; (e) Juan Ramirez; and (f) Angel Ramos; are DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed 3/16/10, by US Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION and ORDER - Defendants' motion to compel is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and the Secretary's motion for protective order is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 1/5/09, by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
