AFD China Intellectual Property Law (USA) Office, Inc. v. AFD China Intellectual Property LLC et al
| 3:2009cv01509 |
| December 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Anna J. Brown |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
401
OPINION & ORDER: The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part AFD China's Bill (# 369 ) of Costs and AWARDS AFD China costs in the amount of $85,743.51. The Court DENIES AFD China's Motion (# 372 ) for Attorney Fees and Non-Taxable Expenses. Signed on December 19, 2014 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (eo)
|
|
Filing
360
ORDER: The Court GRANTS AFD Chinas Motion 344 as to the declaratory judgment that AFD China seeks and AWARDS AFD China $1.00 in nominal damages on its Unfair Competition Claim. The Court DENIES the remainder of AFD Chinas Motion [344 ] as to injunctive relief. The Court also DENIES as premature AFD Chinas Motion 345 for Entry of Judgment on Alter Ego. The Court directs the parties to confer concerning a form of judgment consistent with this Opinion and Order and the other disp ositive decisions in the record. The parties shall submit no later than June 27, 2014, a single jointly proposed form of judgment. To the extent that the parties disagree as to the form of judgment, they each shall file (in addition to the single proposed form, which may include alternative provisions) a memorandum not to exceed five pages explaining the legal bases for any disputed proposals. Signed on 06/12/2014 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
|
|
Filing
193
Order by Judge Anna J. Brown. In the exercise of its discretion and in the absence of more reliable cost information from either party, the Court concludes the following is a fair allocation of these disputed costs between the parties: AFD Chinas tot al claimed copying expense of $15,309.25 shall be reduced by twenty per cent (20%) to $12,247.40, and AFD China is entitled to reimbursement of one-half of that cost from AFD USA in the amount $6,123.70 less the $2,000 AFD US A already paid to AFD China. The Court orders AFD USA to reimburse AFD China the further sum of $4,123.70 for AFD Chinas costs of producing the documents provided to AFD USA in discovery no later than April 1, 2013. Signed on 03/18/2013 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
|
|
Filing
183
Stipulated Order Regarding Schedule of Expert Disclosures. Signed on 02/01/2013 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
|
|
Filing
55
STIPULATION and ORDER: Granting Stipulation re: Plaintiff's Voluntary Dismissal of Claim 8 of the First Amended Complaint Without Prejudice 54 .Signed on 02/15/2012 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: AFD China Intellectual Property Law (USA) Office, Inc. v. AFD China Intellectual Property LLC et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
