Kilbourne v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
| 3:2009cv06367 |
| December 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Ancer L. Haggerty |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER: Granting Stipulated Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 32 .(See formal 2 page Order for details. ) Signed on 7/26/2011 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (sd)
|
|
Filing
31
Opinion and Order. The initial application 26 is denied as moot. The amended application 28 is granted. Plaintiff's counsel shall file the supplemental application within thirty days of this Order. Counsel shall also indicate the counsel's name(s) and address(es) to be used for making payment. (See formal 10 page Order attached) Signed on 6/23/2011 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (sd)
|
|
Filing
24
Opinion and Order. The decision of the Commissioner regarding Lisa Lee Kilbourne must be REVERSED and REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS consistent with this Opinion and Order. Signed on 4/11/11 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (jlr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kilbourne v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
