Delehant v. United States of America
| 3:2010cv00178 |
| February 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| John V. Acosta |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Personal Injury |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
OPINION AND ORDER - Based on the foregoing, Delehant's Bill of Costs 88 is GRANTED, in part and DENIED, in part as follows: Fees of the Clerk - $350.00; Fees for Service of Summons and Subpoena - $50.00; Fees for Printed or Electronic ally Recorded Transcripts - $1,415.00; Fees for Witnesses - $1,185.90; Docket Fees - $20.00; TOTAL COSTS AWARDED - $3,020.90. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 13th day of December, 2012, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
|
Filing
79
FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Within 10 days, Delehant shall submit to the court an appropriate form of JUDGMENT in this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 9th day of October, 2012, by U.S. Magistrate Judge, John V. Acosta. (See formal 34 page document attached to this entry for details.) (peg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Delehant v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
