Beyer et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, et al
| Jon Charles Beyer and Shelley Renee Beyer |
| R.K. Arnold, Angelo Mazilo, Brian T. Moynihan, James Strother and James F. Taylor |
| 3:2010cv00523 |
| May 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Michael W. Mosman |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Foreclosure |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
156
Opinion and Order - Defendants Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 145 is GRANTED and Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend 139 is DENIED. Signed on 6/24/2015 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (mja)
|
|
Filing
123
OPINION AND ORDER: Because the Beyers' complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted: I GRANT defendants' motion to dismiss 67 , I DENY the Beyers' motion for preliminary injunction 75 , and I DENY the Beyers' motion for a temporary restraining order 115 . Signed on 8/1/2011 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER: I DISMISS the complaint as to the corporation defendants for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. I also DISMISS the complaint as to the CEO defendants for improper service of process and lack of personal jurisdiction. I DISMISS the entire complaint for failure to state a claim, and ORDER any amended complaint to meet the simplicity requirements of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed on 10/18/2010 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
