Mentor Graphics Corporation v. EVE-USA, Inc. et al
| Mentor Graphics Corporation |
| EVE-USA, Inc. and Emulation and Verification Engineering, SA |
| 3:2010cv00954 |
| August 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Dennis J. Hubel |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
939
ORDER ON MOTION FOR DISSOLUTION OF INJUNCTION, DISCHARGE OF SUPERSEDEAS BOND, AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Signed on 7/20/2018 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. Associated Cases: 3:10-cv-00954-MO, 3:12-cv-01500-MO, 3:13-cv-00579-MO (kms)
|
|
Filing
852
PERMANENT INJUNCTION FACTUAL BASIS. See order for full text. Signed on 3/17/15 by Judge Michael W. Mosman.Associated Cases: 3:10-cv-00954-MO, 3:12-cv-01500-MO, 3:13-cv-00579-MO (dls)
|
|
Filing
842
OPINION AND ORDER: Mentors Motion for Accounting 783 is DENIED.Synopsyss Motion for JMOL 787 is GRANTED with respect to Mentors contributoryinfringement claim and DENIED in all other respects. Synopsyss Motion for New Trial on Damages 790 is DENIED. Signed on 3/11/15 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. Associated Cases: 3:10-cv-00954-MO, 3:12-cv-01500-MO, 3:13-cv-00579-MO (dls)
|
|
Filing
524
OPINION AND ORDER: Synopsyss Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 371 is GRANTED. Claim preclusion bars Mentor Graphicss counterclaims 382 to the extent that they allege infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,009,531 and 5,649,176. Signed on 6/4/14 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. Associated Cases: 3:10-cv-00954-MO, 3:12-cv-01500-MO, 3:13-cv-00579-MO (dls)
|
|
Filing
499
OPINION AND ORDER. Even if Synopsys diligently pursued the facts it needed in support of its affirmative defense and counterclaim of inequitable conduct, the proposed amendment is futile for two independent reasons: the undisclosed references are no t material to the claims in the 882 patent, and the facts alleged do not support a reasonable inference of intent to deceive. SynopsyssMotion 461 for Leave To File an Amended Answer and Counterclaim is therefore DENIED. Signed on 4/9/14 by Judge Michael W. Mosman.Associated Cases: 3:10-cv-00954-MO, 3:12-cv-01500-MO, 3:13-cv-00579-MO (dls)
|
|
Filing
483
OPINION AND ORDER. See order for full text regarding constructions. Signed on 3/6/14 by Judge Michael W. Mosman.Associated Cases: 3:10-cv-00954-MO, 3:12-cv-01500-MO, 3:13-cv-00579-MO (dls)
|
|
Filing
114
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Hubels recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R 102 as my own opinion, 75 . Signed on 5/25/2011 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER: Defendants' motion to stay discovery 25 is granted in part and denied in part. Signed on 12/15/10 by Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubel. (see formal order) (kb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
