Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
Northwest Environmental Defense Center |
National Marine Fisheries Service and United States Army Corps of Engineers |
3:2010cv01129 |
September 20, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland Office |
John V. Acosta |
Environmental Matters |
16 U.S.C. ยง 1531 Endangered Species Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 121 OPINION and ORDER - For the reasons discussed, NEDC's Motion for Summary Judgment 94 is granted in part and denied in part, and defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment 102 is granted in part and denied in part. The parties shall confer regarding remedies in this matter and must submit a joint status report by April 12, 2013. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 27th day of March 2013, by United States by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg) |
Filing 77 OPINION and ORDER - For the reasons discussed, Defendant's Motion to Strike the Declaration of Carl Page 58 is GRANTED, and NEDC's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction 49 is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 19th day of September, 2011, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg) |
Filing 36 OPINION and ORDER - Because Plaintiff's choice of venue in the Portland division is not improper under the federal and local rules or federal venue statutes, Defendants' Motion to Reassign Venue to the Medford Division 4 is DENIED. Dated this 20th day of April, 2011, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.