Patton v. Thomas et al
| Andrew D. Patton |
| Blunk, Burkholz, John Does 1-50, C/O Heiberthal, C/O Ingram, Robinson, J. E. Thomas and Lt. Van Cleve |
| 3:2010cv01333 |
| October 26, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Michael W. Mosman |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
OPINION AND ORDER: I GRANT defendants motion to dismiss 62 because plaintiffs Fourth Amended Complaint fails under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and dismiss this case with prejudice. I therefore DENY as moot plaintiffs motion for discovery 60 , plaintiffs motion for summary judgment 72 , and defendants motion for a stay 75 . Signed on 5/17/12 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing
54
OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons explained below, defendants' motion 44 is granted, and plaintiffs' 28 50 are denied. Signed on 9/29/2011 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER. All of plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim except that pertaining to the opening of his outgoing legal mail by defendant Kallunki. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 30 days curing the deficien cies pertaining to any access to courts claims he might wish to raise. Plaintiff's second Motion for Appointment of Counsel (#15) is DENIED for the reasons identified in the court's Order (#7) dated January 6, 2011. Signed on 03/02/2011 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (gw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
