League of Wilderness Defenders/Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. United States Forest Service et al
Plaintiff: League of Wilderness Defenders/Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project
Defendant: United States Forest Service and Mary Wagner
Case Number: 3:2010cv01397
Filed: November 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Jones
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 143 Opinion and Order - LOWD's petition for attorney's fees, law student fees, and expert witness fees under the EAJA is GRANTED IN PART. LOWD is awarded a total of $174,278.90 in attorney's fees, representing $78,363.90 in attor ney's fees for time spent by Mr. Jerger, $76,365 in attorney's fees for time spent by Mr. Buchele, and $19,550 in fees for time spent by law students. LOWD is additionally awarded $5,421 for expert witness fees, for a grand total of $179,699.90. Signed on 7/15/2014 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
April 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 125 Opinion and Order - Defendants' motion to stay Plaintiff's petition for attorney's fees 118 is DENIED. Defendants shall have until May 9, 2014, to file their response to Plaintiff's application for attorneys fees. Signed on 4/9/2014 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
August 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 60 Opinion and Order - The Forest Service violated NEPA because its Project FEIS arbitrarily and capriciously did not analyze the cumulative impacts of the proposed action. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 20 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment 25 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed on 8/10/12 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
June 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 46 Opinion and Order - The Forest Service violated NEPA because its Project FEIS arbitrarily and capriciously did not analyze the cumulative impacts of the proposed action. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 20 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment 25 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Forest Service is enjoined from further implementation of the Invasive Plants Treatment Project in the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, and this matter is remanded to the agency for further analysis of cumulative impacts, consistent with NEPA and this opinion. Signed on 6/29/12 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: League of Wilderness Defenders/Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. United States Forest Service et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: League of Wilderness Defenders/Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project
Represented By: Thomas Charles Buchele
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Forest Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?