Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company et al v. Interstate Mechanical, Inc. et al
| Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company and Travelers Indemnity Company |
| Continental Western Insurance Company and Interstate Mechanical, Inc. |
| 3:2010cv01505 |
| December 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Paul Papak |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
376
ORDER: ADOPTING Findings and Recommendation 358 . See order for full text. Signed on 7/23/13 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing
122
OPINION AND ORDER: Travelers motion to strike 79 is DENIED. Glaciers motion for transfer or to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction 54 is DENIED. Glaciers oral motion for the Court to decline to exercise declaratory relief jurisdicti on is DENIED, with leave to renew at a later stage in the proceedings. The joint motions to strike filed by Travelers and Continental 111 117 are DENIED. Travelers motion to file a third amended complaint 57 is GRANTED. Continentals motion to amend its cross-claim 62 is GRANTED. Glaciers motion to vacate the default judgment against Interstate 73 is DENIED. Signed on 4/19/12 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
