Prychyna v. Barrett Business Services, Inc. et al
| Vasiliy I. Prychyna |
| Barrett Business Services, Inc. and Portland Chimney, Inc. |
| 3:2011cv00122 |
| January 31, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Marco A. Hernandez |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
131
STIPULATED ORDER FOR JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Based upon the stipulation of the parties, this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs or fees to any party. Signed on 8/6/2012 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
|
Filing
49
OPINION AND ORDER: BBSI's motion to dismiss 32 is DENIED, Portland Chimney's motion to strike 35 is DENIED, and Portland Chimney's motion to make Plaintiff's claims more definite and certain 35 is DENIED. Portland Chi mney's motion to dismiss 35 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part without prejudice. Specifically, Portland Chimney's motion to dismiss is granted in part without prejudice as to Plaintiff's first, fourth, and fifth claim for relief . Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint is improper and therefore DENIED, and he is ordered to seek leave by formal motion if he desires to amend his complaint. See 22-page opinion and order attached. Signed on 9/27/2011 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
