Hart v. Ahern
Plaintiff: Curtis W. Hart
Defendant: Daniel J. Ahern
Case Number: 3:2011cv00931
Filed: February 14, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
Presiding Judge: Garr M. King
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 Opinion and Order - Defendants Bill of Costs and Disbursements 23 is granted as set forth above in the amount of $5,988.57. Signed on 3/15/2012 by Judge Garr M. King. (ecp)
February 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 22 JUDGMENT - This action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed on 2/14/2012 by Judge Garr M. King. (pc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hart v. Ahern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel J. Ahern
Represented By: Marc Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Curtis W. Hart
Represented By: Steven E. Benson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?