Stevens v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Michele Stevens
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 3:2011cv01207
Filed: October 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Simon
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Medical Care Recovery
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 28 Opinion and Order - The United States' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Dkt. 8 , is GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint, Dkt. 1 , is dismissed with prejudice. Signed on 4/17/12 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stevens v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michele Stevens
Represented By: Jason M. Gore
Represented By: Eric D. Virshbo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?