Apantac, LLC v. Avitech International Corporation et al
| Apantac, LLC |
| Jyh Chern Gong and Avitech International Corporation |
| 3:2011cv01507 |
| December 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Anna J. Brown |
| Contract: Other |
| 8 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
261
ORDER: The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion 257 for Attorney Fees and AWARDS to Plaintiff attorneys' fees in the amount of $5,512.50 and expenses in the amount of $5,716.25. Because there are not any other issues for this Co urt to resolve in this case, the Court DISMISSES this matter in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court directs Plaintiffs counsel to confer with Defendants counsel and to submit no later than September 30, 2014, a form of Final Judgment for the Courts consideration. Signed on 09/16/2014 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 11 page Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)
|
|
Filing
252
Opinion and Order: The Court DENIES Apantacs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 188 , GRANTS in part Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 200 as to Apantac's First and Fourth Claims and DISMISSES without prejudice Apantacs Secon d Claim for Conversion as premature. The Court also DISMISSES Apantacs Third Claim for Slander that Apantac voluntarily withdrew. The Court also ADOPTS in part the Findings and Recommendation (F&R) of the Special Master 244 and SANCTIONS Defendants to pay an AWARD of reasonable attorneys fees and costs to Apantac in amount to be determined at a later date. The Court DECLINES to adopt the remainder of the Special Masters F&R in which he recommends this Court permit further discovery. After de termining the amount of attorneys fees and costs to award to Apantac on its Motion for Sanctions, the Court will DISMISS this matter in its entirety. Unless the parties otherwise settle their differences, the Court directs Apantac to file no later th an July 8, 2014, a motion for its attorneys fees and costs incurred in pursuing discovery as a result of Defendants discovery abuses together with all necessary supporting materials (see Local Rule 54-3). Defendants' response to such Motion (if any) is due July 22, 2014. No reply will be permitted, and the Court will take the issue under advisement on July 22, 2014, without oral argument. Signed on 06/23/2014 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
|
|
Filing
177
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 167 of the Special Master. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion (# 128 ) to Compel; DENIES Defendants Motion (# 129 ) to Compel Responses to Requests for Production Nos. 7 and 11; DENIES Defendan ts Motion (# 139 ) to Compel Responses to Requests for Production Nos. 8, 17, and 18; and DENIES Defendants Motion (# 144 ) to Compel Responses to Request for Production No. 6. The Court also DENIES Plaintiffs request for sanctions with leave to renew at a time permitted by the Special Master or at such later time as permitted by the Court. Signed on 1/24/2014 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (b1)
|
|
Filing
167
Findings & Recommendation on the Parties' Motions to Compel 128 , 129 , 139 and 144 . Signed on 01/03/2014 by Special Master Stephen Joncus. See attached 19 page Findings and Recommendation for full text. (bb)
|
|
Filing
116
Order by Judge Anna J. Brown. Granting Motion to Compel 92 as modified and denies Motion Requesting Permission to Provide Copies of Depositions to Taiwan Authorities 109 as indicated in the attached Order. Joint Status Report is due by 8/9/2013. (bb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
