Tranxition, Inc. v. Novell, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tranxition, Inc.
Defendant: Novell, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2012cv01404
Filed: August 3, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Simon
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 166 OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's objection to costs is OVERRULED in part and SUSTAINED in part. Defendant is awarded $3,084.79. See 4-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 2/14/2016 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
November 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 161 OPINION & ORDER: Tranxition's motion for stay 155 is denied. Tranxition shall file its objections to Novell's Bill of Costs 151 within fourteen days of the date listed below. See 4-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 11/16/2015 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
August 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 145 OPINION & ORDER: Novell's motion 141 to adopt the invalidity opinion entered in related Case No. 3:12-cv-1065-HZ, dismiss certain counter claims, and to enter final judgment is granted. All other outstanding motions are denied as moot. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
March 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 103 OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff Tranxition's Motion to Reconsider Aspects of Claim Construction Orders 93 is denied. See 5-page opinion & order attached. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
October 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 92 OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for order construing claims 72 is granted in part and denied in part. The terms are construed as stated on the record and in this opinion and order. See 17-page opinion & order attached. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
May 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 55 OPINION & ORDER: Defendant Novell's motion to dismiss 22 is denied. This court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant, and the claims for direct and indirect infringement of the 877 and 766 patents have been sufficiently pled. Plaintiff's motion to compel 29 is granted. See 12-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 5/27/2013 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tranxition, Inc. v. Novell, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Novell, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tranxition, Inc.
Represented By: Johnathan E. Mansfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?