Forest Grove School District v. Student
||Forest Grove School District
||October 12, 2012
||Oregon District Court
||Portland (3) Office
||John V. Acosta
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Education
|Cause of Action:
||20:1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 5, 2013
ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation, Dkt. 27 . Plaintiff-Appellant's Motion to Stay 10 is GRANTED. Signed on 7/30/2013 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|June 9, 2014
OPINION and ORDER - The Court AFFIRMS in part and REVERSES in part the decision of ALJ Messecar and concludes the following: (1) The District seriously infringed on Parents right to participate by failing to consider privately obtained educational ev aluations when drafting the November 2011 IEP; (2) denied Student a FAPE by failing to provide adequate transition services during the period covered by the April 2010 IEP; (3) denied Student a FAPE with respect to treating her anxiety and self-manag ement problems during the period between March 2011 and December 2011. The court rules in favor of the District on all of Students remaining claims. Therefore, the court REMANDS this case for additional administrative proceedings consistent with this opinion in order to craft an appropriate remedy for the IDEA violationsoutlined herein. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 9th day of June, 2014, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg) (Main Document 41 replaced on 6/10/2014) (eo).
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.