Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration
Plaintiff: Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program
Defendant: United States Drug Enforcement Administration
Case Number: 3:2012cv02023
Filed: November 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Ancer L. Haggerty
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 60 OPINION AND ORDER signed on 2/11/2013 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. ACLU's Motion for Summary Judgment 27 is GRANTED, the PDMP's Motion for Summary Judgment 24 is DENIED AS MOOT, and the DEA's Cross Motions for Summary Judgment [40 and 42] are DENIED. (sp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program
Represented By: Thomas J. Castle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Drug Enforcement Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?