Skedco, Inc. v. Strategic Operations, Inc.

Plaintiff: Skedco, Inc.
Defendant: Strategic Operations, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2013cv00968
Filed: June 10, 2013
Court: Oregon District Court
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Marco A. Hernandez
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 3, 2014 49 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION & ORDER: The entire claim phrase of "controller connected to" is properly construed as "an activation mechanism joined, united, or linked to." See 27-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 9/3/2014 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Skedco, Inc. v. Strategic Operations, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Skedco, Inc.
Represented By: Nathan C. Brunette
Represented By: Steven T. Lovett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Strategic Operations, Inc.
Represented By: Lloyd Bernstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.