Wyatt v. People's Republic of China et al Featured Case
Plaintiff: Eugene Wyatt
Defendant: Baidu.Com Inc. and People's Republic of China
Case Number: 3:2013cv01685
Filed: September 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: John V. Acosta
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2013 Filing 11 Return of Service Unexecuted as to People's Republic of China. Filed by Eugene Wyatt. (cib)
November 6, 2013 Filing 10 Return of Service Executed as to Baidu.Com Inc. served on 10/31/2013. Filed by Eugene Wyatt. (cib)
October 7, 2013 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Baidu.Com Inc., People's Republic of China. (Summons, USM 285 form(s), and copies of the Complaint and Order to Proceed in forma pauperis forwarded to the U.S. Marshals Service for service.) (cib)
October 3, 2013 Filing 8 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to Eugene Wyatt regarding Discovery order, 7 . (cib)
October 1, 2013 Filing 7 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 1/29/2014. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 2/28/2014. Pretrial Order is due by 2/28/2014. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (cib)
October 1, 2013 Filing 6 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to Eugene Wyatt copy of Order on motion/application for leave to proceed ifp 5 , summons and marshal service forms. (peg)
October 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 1 . Signed on 10/1/13 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
September 27, 2013 Filing 4 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to Eugene Wyatt regarding Case Assignment Notice 3 . (cib)
September 23, 2013 Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (cib)
September 23, 2013 Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Eugene Wyatt against Baidu.Com Inc., People's Republic of China (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet). (cib)
September 23, 2013 Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Eugene Wyatt. (cib)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wyatt v. People's Republic of China et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Baidu.Com Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: People's Republic of China
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eugene Wyatt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?