Stull v. Maurry et al
| Barry Joe Stull |
| Multnomah County Oregon, Jason Maurry, City of Portland, Brad Avakian, Margaret Redondo, Michael D. Schrunk, State of Oregon and Tri Met |
| 3:2013cv02211 |
| December 16, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Garr M. King |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
OPINION AND ORDER - Stull's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 2 is granted, but service is stayed pending the filing of an Amended Complaint. The State of Oregon is dismissed without prejudice. The Multnomah County District At torney is dismissed with prejudice. Stull's claim against Multnomah County arising from the violation charge is dismissed without prejudice. Stull's claim against the City of Portland arising from his arrest record is dismissed with preju dice. I will allow Stull 30 days from the date of this order to file an Amended Complaint clarifying the legal basis for his claims against Officer Stull and alleging an ADA claim against TriMet, the City of Portland, and Multnomah County arising fr om Officer Stull's employment, if he can truthfully correct the deficiencies noted above. If plaintiff fails to amend the complaint within 30 days from the date of this order, I will dismiss the action without ordering the marshal to serve the summons and complaint. Signed on 1/14/2014 by Judge Garr M. King. (pc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
