Adams v. David B. Schumacher, PC

Adams v. David B. Schumacher, PC

Plaintiff:	Bonnie Adams
Defendant:	David B. Schumacher, PC
Case Number:	3:2013cv02301
Filed:	December 30, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge:	John V. Acosta
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 7, 2015	Filing 35 OPINION and ORDER - Adams's motion 27 for damages, costs, and attorney fees, and her bill of costs 28 are DENIED as premature. The parties shall provide the court with proposed pretrial deadlines, specifically dates for any remaining discove ry and a trial, within 30 days of this Opinion. Once the trial is completed and a judgment issued, Adams may file a motion for attorney fees and a bill of costs. DATED this 7th day of April, 2015, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
December 9, 2014	Filing 24 OPINION and ORDER - The court GRANTS Schumacher's motion with regard to § 1692g(a), and DENIES the motion as to § 1692g(b). The court GRANTS Adams's motion with regard to the § 1692g(b) violation, and DENIES the motion as to the § 1692g(a) violation. Adams must file a motion with the court indicating the amount of actual and statutory damages and attorney fees sought by 12/19/14. DATED this 9th day of December 2014, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 7, 2015

Filing 35 OPINION and ORDER - Adams's motion 27 for damages, costs, and attorney fees, and her bill of costs 28 are DENIED as premature. The parties shall provide the court with proposed pretrial deadlines, specifically dates for any remaining discove ry and a trial, within 30 days of this Opinion. Once the trial is completed and a judgment issued, Adams may file a motion for attorney fees and a bill of costs. DATED this 7th day of April, 2015, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)

December 9, 2014

Filing 24 OPINION and ORDER - The court GRANTS Schumacher's motion with regard to § 1692g(a), and DENIES the motion as to § 1692g(b). The court GRANTS Adams's motion with regard to the § 1692g(b) violation, and DENIES the motion as to the § 1692g(a) violation. Adams must file a motion with the court indicating the amount of actual and statutory damages and attorney fees sought by 12/19/14. DATED this 9th day of December 2014, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adams v. David B. Schumacher, PC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bonnie Adams
Represented By:	Joshua R. Trigsted
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: David B. Schumacher, PC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?