Wharton v. Jewell

Wharton v. Jewell

Plaintiff:	Dennis Paul Wharton
Defendant:	Brian Jewell
Case Number:	3:2014cv00314
Filed:	February 24, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge:	Janice M. Stewart
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 7, 2014	Filing 23 ORDER - No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory Committee and reviews Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accor dingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation, (Dkt. 20 ). Defendant Jewell's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 13 ) is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.The Court further finds that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should be revoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed 8/7/2014 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) Modified on 8/7/2014 to add signature date (mja).
February 27, 2014	Filing 4 OPINION AND ORDER : Wharton shall submit a filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action. Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send plaintiff a form application to proceed in forma pauperis . Signed on 2/27/14 by Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart. (jlr)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 7, 2014

Filing 23 ORDER - No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory Committee and reviews Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accor dingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation, (Dkt. 20 ). Defendant Jewell's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 13 ) is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.The Court further finds that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should be revoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed 8/7/2014 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) Modified on 8/7/2014 to add signature date (mja).

February 27, 2014

Filing 4 OPINION AND ORDER : Wharton shall submit a filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action. Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send plaintiff a form application to proceed in forma pauperis . Signed on 2/27/14 by Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart. (jlr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wharton v. Jewell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dennis Paul Wharton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Jewell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?