Albassrei v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Fayez Albassrei |
| Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 3:2014cv00374 |
| March 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Michael W. Mosman |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1182 Immigration & Nationality Act of 1990 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
OPINION AND ORDER: Because I agree with USCISs position that it had statutory authority to revoke its approval of the two Form I-130s filed on behalf of Mr. Al-Bassrei, I therefore find that USCIS did not violate his due process rights. The e ffect of the valid revocation of the approval of theForm I-130s is that Mr. Al-Bassrei cannot satisfy the second requirement of 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a). Since Mr. Al-Bassrei cannot meet the requirements of Section 1255(a), he has provided no legal b asis that could adjust his legal status from an alien ordered to be removed from this country to an alien with LPR. I therefore find that there is no legal basis to stay Mr. Al-Bassreis removalproceedings. Mr. Al-Bassreis prayer for an injunction to stay his removal proceedings and to grant him LPR is DENIED and DISMISSED. Signed on 11/21/14 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
