Edwards v. Multnomah County Sheriff Department et al
| Rod Edwards |
| Jason Gates, Tim Moore, Multnomah County Sheriff Department, Jennifer Ott and Daniel Staton |
| Kathryn A. Short |
| 3:2014cv00531 |
| April 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| John V. Acosta |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 74 . Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF 49 ) is GRANTED and this case is dismissed. Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendants' reply (ECF 69 ) is DENIED as moot. Signed on 7/1/2016 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
|
Filing
34
OPINION and ORDER - The Court ADOPTS IN PART Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (Dkt. 31 ). Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 17 ) IS GRANTED in part AND DENIED in part. Plaintiff's motion is (1) granted with preju dice as to Plaintiff's substantive and procedural due process claims and Plaintiff's Monell claim alleging that defendants Ott, Moore, and Gates' actions as final policy members constituted a violation of Plaintiff's constitutiona l rights; (2) granted without prejudice as to Plaintiff's Monell claim alleging that Multnomah County policy constituted a violation of plaintiff's constitutional rights; and (3) denied as to all remaining claims. Signed 1/26/2015 by Judge Michael H. Simon.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
