Roussel et al v. State of Oregon et al
Rebecca Roussel and Lawrence Roussel |
Nolan Norders, Trooper Fargher, City of Rainier, OR and State of Oregon |
3:2014cv00623 |
April 15, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland (3) Office |
Janice M. Stewart |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 OPINION and ORDER . The Amended Complaint (docket 39 ) is dismissed without prejudice with leave to replead. In addition, pro bono counsel is appointed for the limited purpose of assisting plaintiffs in filing a Second Amended Complaint. The Second Amended Complaint is due 28 days after a pro bono counsel accepts the appointment. Signed on 11/24/14 by Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart. (jlr) |
Filing 6 OPINION AND ORDER Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis docket 1 is GRANTED, and no filing fee will be assessed. However, the defendant State of Oregon is DISMISSED with prejudice and the remainder of the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to replead. The Motion for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel, docket 3 is GRANTED for the limited purpose of assisting plaintiffs in filing an amended complaint. The Amended Complaint is due 28 days after a pro bono counsel accepts the appointment. Signed on 4/24/14 by Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart. (jlr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.