Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Oregon, and Successors, a Corporation Sole
Plaintiff: Mark Doe
Defendant: Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Oregon, and Successors, a Corporation Sole
Case Number: 3:2014cv00658
Filed: April 22, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Janice M. Stewart
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Oregon, and Successors, a Corporation Sole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Oregon, and Successors, a Corporation Sole
Represented By: Andrew J. Lee
Represented By: Thomas V. Dulcich
Represented By: Margaret A. Hoffmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Doe
Represented By: Ashley L. Nastoff
Represented By: Erin K. Olson
Represented By: Gilion C. Dumas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?