Helms Eddy v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Oregon District Court Helms Eddy v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Helms Eddy v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Terri J. Helms Eddy
Defendant:	Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number:	3:2014cv01418
Filed:	September 3, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge:	James A. Redden
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 10, 2017	Filing 37 ORDER TO PAY EAJA FEES: Following my review of Plaintiff's Motion and supporting documentation, and consideration of Defendant's response, and pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, $ 13,899.45 is awarde d to Plaintiff in care of her attorney, Nancy J. Meserow, and the check for EAJA fees shall be made payable to Nancy J. Meserow, based upon Plaintiff's assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff's attorney Nancy J. Meserow, subject to the satisfaction of Plaintiffs debts, if any, under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (201 O); and in addition, Plaintiff is awarded $9.00 for postage expenses, and $10.00 in photocopying costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1920. Signed on 2/10/2017 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms)
November 28, 2016	Filing 31 ORDER: I ADOPT the F&R 28 in part. The Commissioner's decision is therefore REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion. Signed on 11/28/2016 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (jtj)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 10, 2017

Filing 37 ORDER TO PAY EAJA FEES: Following my review of Plaintiff's Motion and supporting documentation, and consideration of Defendant's response, and pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, $ 13,899.45 is awarde d to Plaintiff in care of her attorney, Nancy J. Meserow, and the check for EAJA fees shall be made payable to Nancy J. Meserow, based upon Plaintiff's assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff's attorney Nancy J. Meserow, subject to the satisfaction of Plaintiffs debts, if any, under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (201 O); and in addition, Plaintiff is awarded $9.00 for postage expenses, and $10.00 in photocopying costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1920. Signed on 2/10/2017 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms)

November 28, 2016

Filing 31 ORDER: I ADOPT the F&R 28 in part. The Commissioner's decision is therefore REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion. Signed on 11/28/2016 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (jtj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Helms Eddy v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By:	Ronald K. Silver
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terri J. Helms Eddy
Represented By:	Alan R. Unkeles
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?