Hedin v. Castillo et al
| Terry Paul Hedin |
| Haun D. Castillo, Marion Feather, Richard Kowalczck and Daniel Williams |
| 3:2014cv01504 |
| September 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Mark D. Clarke |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
OPINION AND ORDER: The court ADOPTS Judge Clarke's F&R 97 with the clarification discussed in the Opinion and Order. Signed on 3/26/2020 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 63 . Signed on 11/23/2016 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (br4)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER: Plaintiff's "Supplemental Claim" 51 is construed as a motion to file a supplemental claim, and is allowed. Defendants' Motion for Summary judgment is denied without prejudice to re-file the motion as to plaintiff's complaint as supplemented by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act claim set forth in plaintiff's Motion 51 . Signed on 5/28/15 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Mailed copy to plaintiff) (dsg)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Clark's Findings and Recommendation (#19) and, therefore, DENIES Plaintiff's Motion (#14) for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction.Signed on 02/26/2015 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
