Stewart v. Hawes et al
Plaintiff: Morse Edward Stewart
Defendant: Joseph R. Hawes
Case Number: 3:2014cv01643
Filed: October 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Ann L. Aiken
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 5 is GRANTED, plaintiff's Motion for Default 6 is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED. All other pending motions ( 7 , 10 , and 11 ) are DENIED as moot. See formal OPINION AND ORDER. Copy of OPINION AND ORDER sent to Pro Se Plaintiff. Signed on 2/10/2015 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stewart v. Hawes et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph R. Hawes
Represented By: Floyd C. Mattson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Morse Edward Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?