Vejo v. Portland Public Schools et al
Margarita Vejo |
Petra Callin, Roberta Cooper, Does 1 through 50, Lewis & Clark College and Portland Public Schools |
3:2014cv01656 |
October 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland (3) Office |
Ann L. Aiken |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 80 OPINION and ORDER: PPS defendants' motion to strike (PPS reply mot. summ.j. at 17-23 (66)is granted as to Exhibit 12 to the Grey declaration and denied as to plaintiff's declaration. Defendants' motions to strike [(65) and P PS reply mot. summ.j. at 17-23 (66) are granted in part and denied in part as to the Bufford declaration, as set forth in detail in this Opinion. Defendant Lewis & Clark's motion for summary judgment (41) and the PPS defendants' motion fo r summary judgment (47) are denied with respect to the Fourteenth Amendment claims against Cooper and Callin in their individual capacities (part of the first claim for relief); Denied with respect to the state-law discrimination claims against PPS d efendants pursuant to Or.Rev.Stat.Section 659A.403 (fourth claim for relief); Denied with respect to the contract claims against Lewis & Clark (sixth claim for relief); and granted with respect to all other claims. Signed on 9/6/16 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ljb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.